Damien Hirst Diamond Skull “For the Love of God”
British artist Damien Hirst’s latest work of art has sold for $100 million to an unnamed investment group and Hirst will reportedly get paid in cash. “For the Love of God” is a life-size cast of a human skull in platinum and covered by 8,601 pave-set diamonds weighing 1,106.18 carats. The single large diamond in the middle of the forehead is reportedly worth $4.2 million alone. Hirst financed the project himself, and estimates it cost between 10 and 15 million.
Compared with the epic works that have made his name – the shark in formaldehyde
the bisected cow –
Damien Hirst’s work in progress is a small, delicate object: a life-size human skull. Not just any skull, mind, but one cast in platinum and encased entirely in diamonds – some 8,500 in all. It will be the most expensive work of art ever created, costing between £8m and £10m.
Unveiling his latest work exclusively to The Observer, Hirst said: ‘We have been buying diamonds slowly and have worked out that it will take about eight and half thousand to completely cover the surface of the skull.’
That one alone will cost in the region of £3m to £5m. It is certainly the biggest single undertaking by a jeweller since the Crown jewels’.
Hirst, 40, who was recently ranked as the most powerful individual in the contemporary art world by Art Review magazine, is reputedly worth in the region of £100m.
Creating the world’s most expensive work of art, he says, ‘will be a lot less stressful than putting a bloody great shark in a tank of formaldehyde’.
Nevertheless, even by his ambitious standards, the diamond-encrusted skull, entitled ‘For the Love of God’, is a risky undertaking.
The cost of making it will inevitably be reflected in the selling price, which could be up to £50m.
‘I just want to celebrate life by saying to hell with death,’ said the artist, ‘What better way of saying that than by taking the ultimate symbol of death and covering it in the ultimate symbol of luxury, desire and decadence? The only part of the original skull that will remain will be the teeth. You need that grotesque element for it to work as a piece of art. God is in the details and all that.’
Why, though, is he doing it? ‘I’ve always adhered to the principle that the simplest ideas are the best, and this will be the ultimate two fingers up to death. I want people to see it and be astounded. I want them to gasp.’ But what if it turns out to be more bling than breathtaking? ‘If it’s vulgar, I’ll put it on a chain and hang it round my neck – or I’ll stick it on the mantelpiece.’
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hi, please feel free to share your comment here.
For example: Which pictures is the best?
Thanks,
Admin